Rubymine rails code#
Ruby, and Rails, have lots of documentation within the code itself and that can be presented by RubyMine if available.
Hovering over a class or method, or pressing the F1 key will open up a documentation pop-up (or there’s a dedicated Documentation window that you can keep open). They must have read my mind! I think they will soon include the list of typo suggestions in the quick-fix panel without that extra click. Note: I’ve recently seen a blog that mentions some improvements of the spell-checker. Have to click through the top “Typo: Change to…” menu item. Suggestions for the replacement word is not initially present. Please add an ignore option, because Tvjfe is genuinely not a word!Įven when there’s a genuine typo spotted, it would be nice to have a sensible suggestion presented within the quick-fix panel rather than a sub-menu item. The only way to make typo warnings go away is to add them to the project dictionary. It is annoying having to address flagged issues that are not issues. The issue here is that typos are highlighted throughout the code, in the Problem Highlights at the top-right of every code window, and in the Problems panel. Hence according to RubyMine: uid # OK uidu # Typo uidU # OK uidUi # OK uidUid # OK An uppercase letter is also a boundary, just like it is with CamelCase. What is interesting though is that a word boundary is not necessarily whitespace or punctuation. Good to know that TMnZhxCq is valid but Fxjqi is being caught!īased on observation, what is going on here is RubyMine doesn’t check words with three characters or less. The Problems panel showing four typos within the CSS import, three of which part of the sha256 hash. For example, in one project I’ve got a single stylesheet import coming from a CDN, spanning over two lines. One place which seems particularly tricky is URIs. However, it’s quite common to get a few false positives. I do expect to have to regularly add words not in the typical spell check dictionary.
The require method will typically accept a value that corresponds to a Model, and given that Rails does have all the column names defined in its schema reference, then it would be lovely for non-trivial cases where a modal may have dozens of attributes to have the permit method with useful suggestions. So before passing incoming params to your AR object you accept the values that can be used. Secondly, the other common thing to do is permit which params are allowed to be passed to ActiveRecord for use in creating/updating records. Firstly, RubyMine could parse routes.rb file to offer some suggestions for the dynamic segments? That is, if I start typing params[: then it would offer :user_id as the top suggestion. Wouldn’t it be nice if RubyMine could assist with params? Two ways come to mind. On a slightly different note… It’s incredibly common to be dealing with params for CRUD operations. It’s annoying for me because I often have method signatures that have a defined, expected type, e.g., an integer, but if I pass params to that method then RubyMine flags it with a warning, effectively saying that I shouldn’t be passing a Parameters object to an argument that expects an Integer.
This is obviously part of the widespread type inference deficiency that RubyMine suffers from as documented in part 1. params = ActionController::Parameters.new(person: permitted: false> params.class # => Integer It may be a Parameters object if the value also needs to hold a Hash-like structure. Hovering over the variable shows that RubyMine thinks this value will be an instance of Parameters.
0 kommentar(er)
